Is modern medicine responsible for saving millions of childrens lives? Many information pamphlets advertising childhood vaccines will take the mortality numbers of the early 1900's and claim that vaccines are responsible for a large reduction in deaths leaving out the fact that long before vaccines arrived infant infectious disease fatality had already dropped sharply.
The real contributors to the drop in infant mortality that arrived before the vaccines.
Clean drinking water.
Access to sanitation and sewer systems.
Decrease in poverty and starvation.
Refrigeration beginning in the 1920's greatly reduced spoilage and food born illness.
The use of a pesticide known as Dinitrophenol was phased out in the early 1900's to 1950's it was toxic to the mitochondria via inhibition of Complex V (ATP Synthase).
Lead arsenate was a popular insecticide used extensively in the early 1900's to control a variety of pests, particularly in orchards. However, its use declined sharply after World War II due to concerns about lead toxicity.
Clean streets without horse manure and resulting increase in diseased rodents.
Elimination of lead from home interiors like wallpaper and children's toys.
Home and city plumbing predominantly lead in the 1890s with the use of cast iron due to their malleability. Galvanized steel began its use in the 1900's due to its corrosion resistance with a layer of zinc. By the 1920s and 1930s, copper plumbing systems started to be used more regularly, particularly in residential construction. By 1944 copper was adopted mainstream in residential construction, significantly crowding out existing and new plumbing systems.
Advanced neonatal care procedures.
Increase in full term births resulting in child immune system resilience.
When we can appreciate the level of dangerous toxins in the lives of our children in the early 1900's we understand why infectious disease had such a strong grip on our lives. Hard work from our builders of sewer and water infrastructure, neonatal doctors, farmers and inventors deserve the credit they are due. They brought us out of poverty, replaced the horses to clean up the streets, made non toxic paints that made toys safe for children and replaced the toxic plumbing under our streets and in our walls. Do the inventors of modern pharmaceuticals and vaccines deserve the praise they are getting? I believe the workers in dirty overalls deserve at least the same respect as those in clean white lab coats.
We are now being exposed to a new and developing risk for the re-apparition of disease for the following reasons and have already seen a significant regression as a result.
Fluoride added to the drinking water is now blocking the health benefits of our installation of copper plumbing systems.
Poly-Unsaturated omega 6 consumption now seven to ten times higher than our pre-industrialized food era.
Plant based food consumption has doubled and is driving an excess of vitamin A and glyphosate into the body.
Rampant pharmaceutical prescriptions and over the counter drug use for the masking of symptoms is allowing sub-clinical toxicity, infection and insulin resistance to become widespread.
All of this affects kids because parents are more physically and emotionally disabled making them less able to care and provide for their children. The cycle becomes vicious when we are no longer sleeping due to the kids being up all night.
How do we build on the progress of our ancestors while honoring their hard work?
Get the glyphosate and fluoride out of our food and water supply.
Raise animals in natural integrated environments and on pasture.
Switch to regenerative agriculture integrating more animals into our ecosystem to feed us and the soil.
Reject synthetic pharmaceutical compounds and believe in the power of nurturing our bodies with the essential nutrients it need for functional biology.
Help kids be present with themselves and put away distractions so we can get quiet at night and get back to getting a good nights rest.
Its apparent that the vaccines were able to reduce disease transmission for the respective diseases they target while creating an increase in the severity and transmission of all other virus's and disease.
What we must ask ourselves is if this is producing a NET benefit to our children?
Take a look at the results of a brand new study from 2025 entitled "Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid"
Results:
"The analysis of claims data for 47,155 nine-year-old children revealed that:
1) vaccination was associated with significantly increased odds for all measured NDDs;
2) among children born preterm and vaccinated, 39.9% were diagnosed with at least one NDD compared to 15.7% among those born preterm and unvaccinated (OR 3.58, 95% CI: 2.80, 4.57); and
3) the relative risk of ASD increased according to the number of visits that included vaccinations. Children with just one vaccination visit were 1.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than the unvaccinated (95% CI: 1.21, 2.35) whereas those with 11 or more visits were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with ASD than those with no visit for vaccination (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84)."
A study conducted by James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, and Dr. Paul Thomas, MD. titled 'Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination,' analyzed data from 3,300 patients at Dr. Thomas’ Oregon pediatrics practice, Integrative Pediatric.
They found significantly higher incidence of many diseases beyond neurodevelopmental disorders. They were immediately silenced by pharma's death grip on medical boards.
In the US from 1999 to 2018, the pharmaceutical and health product industry contributed $414 million to federal candidates, national party committees, and outside spending groups. From 1999 to 2018, the pharmaceutical and health product industry recorded $4.7 billion in lobbying expenditures at the federal level, more than any other industry. The trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America accounted for $422 million (9.0%), and the other 19 top companies and organizations in this industry accounted for $2.2 billion (46.8%). Pfizer's political action committee alone contributed to 228 lawmakers, and Amgen's PAC donated to 218, meaning that each company helped to fund the campaigns of nearly half the lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
It's reasonable to consider additional comprehensive, peer-reviewed studies on the long-term effects of vaccines on child health would be beneficial. Despite calls for more transparent and rigorous studies its quite apparent that pharma will not pursue this, because it would provide further insight into the impact of vaccines on children's overall health and the frequency of medical clinic visits, further eroding confidence in these widely considered 'vital' public health interventions.
While vaccines have undoubtedly reduced the transmission of targeted diseases, concerns have arisen about potential unintended consequences. The intensive focus on specific diseases through vaccination may lead to an unintended increase in the severity and transmission of other viruses. Consider the less-discussed illnesses like Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Lyme disease, and many other non-communicable diseases which lack vaccines. These infections often result in significant chronic illness for many, and they can remain dormant in the body until an opportunistic co-infection triggers their resurgence.
Injected Aluminum Salts vs the Aluminum We Consume in Our Food Every Day
A study showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain.
Injected aluminum cannot be removed by the kidneys, whereas ingested aluminum can. This is because injected aluminum is in the form of nanoparticles, which dissolve very slowly into ionic form. These nanoparticles are too large to be removed, especially when they have absorbed antigen. On the other hand, aluminum absorbed from ingestion is already in ionic form, which is rapidly removed by the kidneys.
Aluminum salts inhibit critical human enzymatic processes, including the G6PD enzyme important for immune/detox function and acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme involved in the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. This interference can have implications for nerve function and is relevant in the context of neurological health. These inhibitory effects could have lasting consequences, affecting children for several months or even years after vaccination.
The context of all these toxins appearing with the attenuated viral protein build immunity to that virus, however it is also possible that if their are any other proteins that are not virus's in the circulating area, potentially from a leaky gut, the child could also develop immunity against proteins like gluten, gliadin, casein and possibly misbehaving human proteins that are under the influence of retinoic acid or retinol in serum. This could lead to exaggerated immunity being triggered chronically causing what are alleged to be "auto" immune reactions. Vaccines are very new to society and we have allot of suspicious activity going on under the radar.
It is crucial to encourage awareness not only about the diseases targeted by vaccines but also about the potential side effects of the vaccine components themselves. When we hyperfocus the immune system on a narrow set of diseases, we risk neglecting the vast diversity of biological threats that our bodies encounter regularly.
Amid this complex landscape, it's imperative to ask whether the childhood vaccination schedule truly produces a net benefit for our children. The reality is that few with established credibility are willing to risk their political careers and livelihoods to challenge the status quo. However, we should acknowledge and commend those who are courageous enough to advocate for the well-being of children, even at personal and professional cost. But relying solely on a few individuals to drive change is insufficient. It's essential for all of us, as a collective force, to engage in informed discussions, advocate for transparency, and call for comprehensive research to ensure that public health policies align with the best interests of our communities. In a democracy, the government is a reflection of the people, and it is through collective action that we can drive meaningful change in healthcare and beyond.
Vaccine and Health Outcome Studies:
Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children ~ Anthony R Mawson https://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php
Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders ~ Brian S Hooker and Neil Z Miller https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268563/
Observe the chart below for children aged 0 to 4 in New Zealand. The introduction of the covid vaccine appeared to have a bigger impact on childhood mortality than the virus itself. We have too many examples of the cure being worse than the disease.
