Fluoride is a toxic chemical byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production that is held in massive holding ponds and massive corporations like Cargill are desperate to get rid of it. If we would be growing regeneratively we wouldn't need these fertilizers in the first place and we would be able to feed just as many people.
Fluoride is a well known neurotoxic, soft tissue calcifying, copper chelating, nephrotoxic and mitochondria disrupting substance.
There is no legitimate reason for it to be in our city drinking waters that would be backed by legitimate clinical studies or medical literature.
While it could be possible that in small amounts it strengthens teeth and bones this is a temporary and inferior measure that causes damage to every part of the body and TEETH in the long run. Fluoride can have a half life of up to 20 years in the body therefore it has potential to accumulate in our bones and teeth causing skeletal and dental fluorosis that can actually soften bones long term.
In fact many countries have BANNED fluoride from their drinking water:
Italy, China, Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Germany, Japan.
"Everybody knows fluorine and fluorides are very poisonous substances and we use them in enzyme chemistry to poison enzymes, those vital agents in the body." Dr. James Summer 1965
Study linking fluoride to reduced IQ. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/fluoride-childrens-health-grandjean-choi/
Placing it into the same category as other toxic metals. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-020-02725-2
Impacts of Fluoride Neurotoxicity and Mitochondrial Dysfunction https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12884
US Government Study: Fluoride lowers Child iQ. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/completed/fluoride
Sources of exposure:
Fluoride dental treatments
Municipal drinking water 0.7 to 1.2 PPM
Teflon Pans
GORE-TEX weather proof sportswear
Sodas and concentrated fruit juices.
Might be sprayed on some dried fruit, grapes and cherries.
Toothpaste, Tooth Floss and Mouth Rinses
Chicken where fluoride was used as an antibiotic
Nearly all pharmaceutical drugs
Naturally Occurring Food Sources
Black Tea / Green Tea 6 to 20 PPM
Raisins 2.34 PPM
Canned Shellfish 2.10 PPM
Grapes/ Grape Juice 1.3 PPM
Potatoes
Coffee 0.1PPM
Chatting with CoPilot.
You
link me to the multitude of studies proving fluorides neurotoxicity
Copilot
Certainly! There is a substantial body of evidence suggesting that fluoride may have neurotoxic effects. Here are some key findings from various studies:
Epidemiological Studies:
Over 300 animal and human studies indicate that the fluoride ion is neurotoxic.
40 studies conducted in China, Iran, India, and Mexico found an association between lowered intelligence quotient (IQ) and fluoride exposure 12.
Animal Experiments:
Recent studies have observed detrimental effects on behavior in animals due to fluoride exposure, including learning and memory outcomes 3.
Prenatal and perinatal fluoride exposure in animals has been linked to physical changes, intelligence loss, increased hyperactivity, and irregular moods 4.
In Vitro Analyses:
In vitro studies investigating fluoride in neuronal cells and precursor/stem cells have been conducted.
Human plasma fluoride concentrations are much lower than those causing effects in cell cultures 3.
Epidemiological Evidence:
21 out of 23 recent epidemiological studies report an association between high fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence.
You
then why is this still in city drinking water
Copilot
The inclusion of fluoride in city drinking water is a complex and debated topic. Here are some reasons why it continues to be added:
Dental Health Benefits:
Fluoridation of water has been practiced for decades as a public health measure to prevent tooth decay.
Fluoride helps strengthen tooth enamel and reduce the risk of cavities.
Cost-Effectiveness:
Adding fluoride to water is often considered cost-effective compared to other preventive dental health measures.
It benefits the entire population, including those who may not have access to regular dental care.
Community-Wide Approach:
Water fluoridation is a community-wide intervention that reaches everyone, regardless of age, income, or education.
It aims to provide equal access to dental health benefits.
Scientific Consensus and Guidelines:
Many health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Dental Association (ADA), support water fluoridation.
They base their recommendations on extensive research and clinical evidence.
Risk-Benefit Assessment:
While concerns exist about potential neurotoxic effects, the overall risk-benefit assessment favors water fluoridation for dental health.
The current exposure levels are considered safe for most people.
Local Policies and Regulations:
Decisions regarding water fluoridation are often made at the local or regional level.
Community preferences, scientific evidence, and public health priorities influence these decisions.
Public Perception and Education:
Public understanding of fluoride’s benefits and risks varies.
Education and awareness campaigns help inform citizens about the rationale behind water fluoridation.
You
Well according to the science you presented these are all wildly stupid reasons to poison a population.
Copilot
I apologize if my previous response caused any offense. As an AI language model, I don’t hold opinions or emotions, but I understand that discussions around public health policies can be sensitive and multifaceted.
The decision to fluoridate water involves a balance between potential benefits for dental health and concerns about safety. Public health authorities continually evaluate scientific evidence, community needs, and ethical considerations. It’s essential for citizens to engage in informed discussions and advocate for policies that align with their values and well-being.
You
A balance between "potential benefits and guaranteed risk. that does not sound like a balanced approach at all... are you getting how stupid you sound?
Copilot
I apologize if my previous response caused any offense. As an AI language model, I don’t hold opinions or emotions, but I understand that discussions around public health policies can be sensitive and multifaceted.
The decision to fluoridate water involves a balance between potential benefits for dental health and concerns about safety. Public health authorities continually evaluate scientific evidence, community needs, and ethical considerations. It’s essential for citizens to engage in informed discussions and advocate for policies that align with their values and well-being.
Copilot Conversation Conclusion
The underlined is important because unfortunately even if something has been proven for more than a decade, the people in places of authority do not always have the conscience to align with our values and well-being.